| 论文简介 |
The authors regret that the experimental condition in Figs. 3–6 and Figs. 13–15 were missing. The complete information about the experimental results appears below:
1. In Fig. 3, the flow condition should be:dT=19 mm, usg=6.17 m/s, usl=7.49×10−3 m/s, View the MathML source
2. In Fig. 4, the flow condition should be:dT=19 mm, Ml=16.25×10−2 kg/s
3. In Fig. 5, the flow condition should be:dT=19 mm, Ml=16.25×10−2 kg/s
4. In Fig. 6, the flow condition should be:dT=19 mm, usg=6.05 m/s, View the MathML source
5. In Fig. 13, the flow condition should be:
(a) dT=19 mm, usg=7.95 m s−1, usl=2.60×10−1 m·s−1, View the MathML source
(b) dT=19 mm, usg=9.01 m s−1, usl=6.52×10−2 m·s−1, View the MathML source
6. In Fig. 14, the flow condition should be:dT=19 mm, usg=12.73 m s−1, View the MathML source
7. In Fig. 15, the flow condition should be:
dT=19 mm, Ml=2.42×10−2 kg·s−1.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. |
(创新港)
